So now two western journalists have been killed in Syria, as a result of shelling from the Syrian army. Not too long ago the difficulties there were not insurmountable, and could probably have been resolved to everyone's advantage. But then the US ambassador started agitating the dissenters, going about in his diplomatic car to various meetings and ramping up the heat. Eventually, of course, things turned ugly, and he had to be withdrawn because his actions resulted in his life being endangered. But he's responsible for what we're seeing now, him and his American bosses who were collaborating in what he was about. It's no good simply blaming Assad for these deaths, and for Sarcozy to say 'That's enough. The regime must go."
In 2006 the Israelis were shelling southern Lebanon, trying to wipe out a number of Hezbollah they knew were in the area. There was a UN observation post there too, and the Israeli artillery, despite several communications from the UN telling them this, continued targetting the zone and killed 4 UN peacekeepers. There were no calls then for regime change in Israel. All this media coverage is agenda-based, and things are only done if the Yanks and their allies want them to be so. Everything else gets conveniently swept under the carpet.
-
- http://seasideman.com/
- 2012-02-23 @ 12:39:33
I wonder what Marie Colvin would have thought of your assertion that "All this media coverage is agenda-based".
-
- 2012-02-24 @ 11:43:41
Okay smart arse. No doubt she would have vociferously disagreed with that, as would Kate Adey in her time. You need to think though: who are these reporters working for (eg the BBC)and what the bottom line is. As I've said before, how come you never see these reporters in position for weeks telling the World about the Israeli army?
-
- http://www.jenniferhunter.co.uk
- 2012-02-23 @ 14:14:17
I think Russia and China, ojb, do hold quite a high degree of responsibility for the situation in Syria now since these two powers vetoed any real action against Assad...really haven't heard much about the US ambassador and what he's been up to, and Marie Colvin and the French photographer have died while trying to show how bad the situation is now, also it was said today that the Syrian army knew where the journalists were, but still directed their shells in that area so we should presume they didn't care if journalists died...if Assad goes though the country will probably collapse into civil war because there are three distinct groups in the country and I think they don't get on...as we're seeing in Iraq now where 50 people died yesterday in bombings in Baghdad...not suggesting Assad stays, or that Saddam Hussein should have been left in place, but, like Tito in Yugoslavia, these particular leaders were keeping the lid on a volcano, which erupted after two were removed, and probably will if Assad is ousted or killed...human beings do have a horrible habit of splitting into warring factions after a revolution with almost as much bloodshed following on that happened in the original revolution...

-
- 2012-02-23 @ 19:34:31
spot on Jen GBH

-
- 2012-02-24 @ 11:55:02
Apparently they vetoed because of the wording of the proposed action(s) to be taken. At least their veto carries more integrity than the US/Israel vetoing of Palestine being accepted into the UN. The US ambassador is Robert Ford, who was pelted with tomatoes as he met one of the opposition groups' leaders before he left the country. Selective journalism is a weapon as much as anything, as you'll know.
-
- 2012-02-24 @ 19:02:26
One sticking point is that the elimination of the State of Israel has been one of Hezbollah's primary goals. I suspect they need to alter their manifesto... and try for a less inflammatory goal... Israel needs to back off and continue to return their lands back to them. If only both sides can be made to stand back and negotiate even harder...as the only alternative to a negotiated agreement is more battles and conflict...which is not ever going to be a solution.
what is your solution to the area?
-
- 2012-02-23 @ 19:33:39
regime change in Israel.??? from what to what??
-
- 2012-02-24 @ 11:47:17
From a bunch of lying murderous gits to a government operating with genuine democracy towards the indigenous population of Palestine. Will that do? Seems you're not very clued up about what's happening out there at all Jacky.
-
- 2012-02-24 @ 18:35:48
I am starting to get the feeling that you do not like Israel...cant put my finger on it...but there is something....


Leave a comment
Hide subcomments